Cannabis Businesses Alternatives to Bankruptcy –

0

To print this article, all you need to do is be registered or log in to Mondaq.com.

Federal bankruptcy courts are largely inaccessible to companies operating in the cannabis space1. While cannabis companies cannot entirely avoid pending lawsuits, or the opportunity to restructure or maximize value through a “free and clear” sale as provided by Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, there are other forms of relief available for cannabis and cannabis ancillary products. state law companies.

The most common forms of relief available to cannabis businesses are an assignment for the benefit of creditors (ABC) or receivership under state law. Similar to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding, an ABC and receivership are state law mechanisms for the structured liquidation of assets, as well as the restructuring of a business.

ABCs and receiverships are not governed by the Bankruptcy Code. Rather, each state has its own law providing a process for liquidating a debtor’s assets through an assignment of the assets to an assignee. The assignee oversees the liquidation of assets and distributions to creditors, which is generally faster and less expensive than a bankruptcy proceeding.

The main difference between an ABC and a receivership is that an ABC is a voluntary alternative to bankruptcy that transfers the debtor’s assets to a trust for liquidation and distribution, whereas a receivership is often involuntary and a receiver is usually appointed by the court at the request of a creditor. Receiverships are also often more expensive and do not allow for the collection of preferential or insider payments to creditors.

A more affordable option would be a debt “resolution,” which is settled out of court and allows a struggling cannabis business to negotiate with creditors to restructure the amount owed or repayment terms of a debt. Negotiating directly with creditors can be potentially beneficial by extending the maturities of debt securities, modifying the binding clauses of agreements and providing more advantageous payment terms.

This option generally requires a good faith relationship between debtor and creditor, as it does not involve hiring or requesting the appointment of a third party. While this option may be more affordable, cannabis companies cannot use the threat of bankruptcy as leverage to obtain more favorable terms.

Although neither of these options offers the same protection as the Bankruptcy Code, some forms of creditor protection are available to cannabis companies and cannabis ancillary companies.

This alert is not intended to replace legal advice on specific matters.

Harris Beach has offices throughout New York State, including Albany, Buffalo, Ithaca, Melville, New York, Rochester, Saratoga Springs, Syracuse, Uniondale, and White Plains, as well as Washington DC, New Haven, Connecticut and Newark, New Jersey.

Footnote

1. See our September 15 legal alert on this subject.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide on the subject. Specialist advice should be sought regarding your particular situation.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Cannabis and hemp from the United States

The role of auditing and monitoring in compliance

Ankura Consulting Group LLC

Internal audit and oversight functions are important to an organization’s ability to design and implement an effective compliance program. Although each function has a distinct mandate…

Share.

About Author

Comments are closed.